5 Bullets: Data Dump

Task: Create a table, 5 rows by 6 columns with the following headers: Input, Congressional Language, Presidential Priorities, Warfighter Language, Impact Statement, Recommendation.

1) Ingest my five INPUTs by asking me to input them,

2) Drop those INPUTs into the Input column, and analyze each INPUTs adherence to the next four columns (Congressional Language, Presidential Priorities, Warfighter Language, Impact Statement), based on the following four CRITERIA:

a) Congressional Language: To what extent do my INPUTs utilize congressionally mandated verbiage or synonyms (defense, innovation, acquisition, effective, research, development, system, technology, military, requirements, national, information, commercial, data, support, implementation, systems, programs, federal, security, business, pilot, performance, government, technical, service, regulations, management, engineering, armed, industrial, test, assessment, requirement, process, products, guidance, intelligence, manufacturing, science, technologies, sustainment, foreign, operations, weapon, production, operational, personnel, decision, develop, critical, navy, joint, testing, developed, strategy, training, education, processes, reserve, artificial, analysis, software, equipment, missile, risk, regulation, control, laboratory, standards, certification, schedule, value, naval, proposals, cooperative, identification, reports, coordination, audit, force, construction, logistics, operation, air, laboratories, notification, combat, facility, oversight, strategic, applications, country, prototype, energy, plans, progress, application, infrastructure, availability, organization, digital, integration, status, electronic, aircraft, inspector, assessments, transition, improve, mission, rapid, contingency, developing, space, compliance, classified, medical, administrative, deployment, maintenance)? If there is a strong use of these words or their synonyms, add only the word "strong" to the corresponding cell. If there is a minimal use of these words, add the word "tenuous" and examples of words which may apply from the above list. If very few of these words or their synonyms exist, add the word "weak" and examples of words which may apply from the above list.

b) Presidential Priorities: Which of my INPUTs adhere to the following 17 Presidential Priorities (Southwest Border Activities, Combating Transnational Criminal Organizations in the Western Hemisphere; Audit; Nuclear Modernization (including NC3); Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs); Virginia-class Submarines; Executable Surface Ships; Homeland Missile Defense; One-Way Attack/Autonomous Systems; Counter-small UAS (Unmanned Aerial Systems) Initiatives; Priority Critical Cybersecurity; Munitions; Core Readiness, including full DRT (training) funding; Munitions and Energetics Organic Industrial Bases; Executable INDOPACOM (India Pacific Command) MILCON (military construction); Combatant Command support agency funding for INDOPACOM, NORTHCOM, (Northern Command), SPACECOM, (Space Command) STRATCOM, (Strategic Command) CYBERCOM, (Cyber Command) and TRANSCOM (Transportation Command); Medical Private-Sector Care)? Place the respective Presidential Priority into the corresponding cell where applicable.

c) Warfighter Language: Do these INPUTs appear to be directed at "warfighter" activities rather than "administrative" activities? Examples of warfighter activities include command and control, movement and maneuver, intelligence, targeting processes, sustainment fight, protection, threat assessment, training, combat, simulation, threat detection, national safety and security, combat, critical path, anticipating requirements, shipbuilding, decision making, delivering physical products, artificial intelligence, cyber security, automation, efficiency, efficacy. If the language appears to be directed at "warfighter" add only the word "warfighter" in the corresponding cell., if it appears to be an administrative task, add only the word "administrative."

d) Impact: To what extent do my INPUTs contain strong "impact" statements? Impact statements are sentences which conclude with demonstrable, quantifiable, or qualifiable improvements. If the input appears to be an impact statement, add only the word "Yes" to the corresponding cell, otherwise add only the word "No".

3) Provide feedback on how to strengthen the INPUTs based on the CRITERIA above in the Recommendation cell.

Task: Create a response to each of the five INPUTs with the following format:

INPUT: (ingest and display my exact input language). Use these INPUTs as the basis for the following five criteria:

Criterion 1) CONGRESSIONAL LANGUAGE: To what extent do my INPUTs utilize congressionally mandated verbiage or synonyms (defense, innovation, acquisition, effective, research, development, system, technology, military, requirements, national, information, commercial, data, support, implementation, systems, programs, federal, security, business, pilot, performance, government, technical, service, regulations, management, engineering, armed, industrial, test, assessment, requirement, process, products, guidance, intelligence, manufacturing, science, technologies, sustainment, foreign, operations, weapon, production, operational, personnel, decision, develop, critical, navy, joint, testing, developed, strategy, training, education, processes, reserve, artificial, analysis, software, equipment, missile, risk, regulation, control, laboratory, standards, certification, schedule, value, naval, proposals, cooperative, identification, reports, coordination, audit, force, construction, logistics, operation, air, laboratories, notification, combat, facility, oversight, strategic, applications, country, prototype, energy, plans, progress, application, infrastructure, availability, organization, digital, integration, status, electronic, aircraft, inspector, assessments, transition, improve, mission, rapid, contingency, developing, space, compliance, classified, medical, administrative, deployment, maintenance)? If there appears to be a use of these words or their synonyms, add only the word "Strong" to the corresponding response. If there is a minimal use of these words, add the word "Tenuous" and examples of words which may apply from the above list. If very few of these words or their synonyms exist, add the word "Weak" and examples of words which may apply from the above list.

Criterion 2) PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITIES: To what extent do my INPUTs utilize the language in the following 17 Presidential Priorities (Southwest Border Activities, Combating Transnational Criminal Organizations in the Western Hemisphere; Audit; Nuclear Modernization (including NC3); Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs); Virginia-class Submarines; Executable Surface Ships; Homeland Missile Defense; One-Way Attack/Autonomous Systems; Counter-small UAS (Unmanned Aerial Systems) Initiatives; Priority Critical Cybersecurity; Munitions; Core Readiness, including full DRT (training) funding; Munitions and Energetics Organic Industrial Bases; Executable INDOPACOM (India Pacific Command) MILCON (military construction); Combatant Command support agency funding for INDOPACOM, NORTHCOM, (Northern Command), SPACECOM, (Space Command) STRATCOM, (Strategic Command) CYBERCOM, (Cyber Command) and TRANSCOM (Transportation Command); Medical Private-Sector Care)? Place the respective Presidential Priority into the corresponding response field where applicable.

Criterion 3) WARFIGHTER OR ADMINISTRATIVE: Do these INPUTs appear to be directed at "Warfighter" activities rather than "Administrative" activities? Examples of warfighter activities include command and control, movement and maneuver, intelligence, targeting processes, sustainment fight, protection, threat assessment, training, combat, simulation, threat detection, national safety and security, combat, critical path, anticipating requirements, shipbuilding, decision making, delivering physical products, artificial intelligence, cyber security, automation, efficiency, efficacy. If the language appears to be directed at "warfighter" add only the word "Warfighter" in the corresponding field, if it appears to be an administrative task, add only the word "Administrative" in the corresponding field.

Criterion 4) IMPACT STATEMENT: To what extent do my INPUTs contain strong "impact" statements? Impact statements are sentences which include demonstrable, quantifiable, or qualifiable improvements. If the input appears to be an impact statement, add the word "Yes" to the corresponding field and tell me what the impact is, otherwise add only the word "No".

Criterion 5) RECOMMENDATION: Provide feedback on how to strengthen the INPUTs based on how closely my INPUTS align to the four sections above in the Recommendation field Repeat this until all five INPUTs display responses for all five criteria. Your response should show solely the INPUTs and criteria, no other text (no intro, no next steps, no explanation)

Now ask me for my five INPUTs: